<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Rachel C. Weingarten muses on Marketing, Manners and Modness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rachelcw.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rachelcw.com</link>
	<description>Marketing, Manners, Modness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:36:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nike&#8217;s Pound of (Tiger&#8217;s) Flesh by Alisa Bowman</title>
		<link>http://rachelcw.com/2010/04/09/nikes-pound-of-tigers-flesh/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisa Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelcw.com/?p=726#comment-601</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I couldn&#039;t figure out why they would possibly even think of running a commercial about it all. Something like that is just bound to flop. Silence on their part would have been a better strategy, right? After a few games (or tournaments... whatever those golf things are called... can you tell I&#039;m not a fan???) his transgressions would have blown over. Now they&#039;ve just made it all last longer.

My prediction, however, is that a serial cheater like Tiger won&#039;t be able to keep it in his pants for long. I suppose he might be a bit more discrete about it all, but I think there&#039;s going to be more news on that front eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I couldn&#8217;t figure out why they would possibly even think of running a commercial about it all. Something like that is just bound to flop. Silence on their part would have been a better strategy, right? After a few games (or tournaments&#8230; whatever those golf things are called&#8230; can you tell I&#8217;m not a fan???) his transgressions would have blown over. Now they&#8217;ve just made it all last longer.</p>
<p>My prediction, however, is that a serial cheater like Tiger won&#8217;t be able to keep it in his pants for long. I suppose he might be a bit more discrete about it all, but I think there&#8217;s going to be more news on that front eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nike&#8217;s Pound of (Tiger&#8217;s) Flesh by Rachel Weingarten</title>
		<link>http://rachelcw.com/2010/04/09/nikes-pound-of-tigers-flesh/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Weingarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelcw.com/?p=726#comment-583</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sam.

Alix, it&#039;s definitely a different way of looking at things, I just tend to wonder where they got the audio from and I&#039;m guessing they didn&#039;t have the senior Woods&#039; permission to use it posthumously in this or any way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sam.</p>
<p>Alix, it&#8217;s definitely a different way of looking at things, I just tend to wonder where they got the audio from and I&#8217;m guessing they didn&#8217;t have the senior Woods&#8217; permission to use it posthumously in this or any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nike&#8217;s Pound of (Tiger&#8217;s) Flesh by Alix</title>
		<link>http://rachelcw.com/2010/04/09/nikes-pound-of-tigers-flesh/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Alix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelcw.com/?p=726#comment-581</guid>
		<description>You know I was very disgusted at Tiger&#039;s behavior and thought this was his way toapologize to his father for desecrating his memory and good name. Do you think that makes sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I was very disgusted at Tiger&#8217;s behavior and thought this was his way toapologize to his father for desecrating his memory and good name. Do you think that makes sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nike&#8217;s Pound of (Tiger&#8217;s) Flesh by Sam</title>
		<link>http://rachelcw.com/2010/04/09/nikes-pound-of-tigers-flesh/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelcw.com/?p=726#comment-578</guid>
		<description>That is the best article I have read about Tiger Woods so far.  He&#039;s a dick but a helluva golf player- let him play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the best article I have read about Tiger Woods so far.  He&#8217;s a dick but a helluva golf player- let him play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Curse of The Golden Girls? by Alisa Bowman</title>
		<link>http://rachelcw.com/2010/03/19/curse-of-the-golden-girls/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisa Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelcw.com/?p=715#comment-545</guid>
		<description>Hummm.... but have they done a study of the marriages of the actresses who lost? Are they just as likely to break up? It seems like Hollywood in general has a very high 1) divorce rate 2) cheating spouse rate. I tend more toward the conclusions that Elizabeth Gilbert made in Committed: some people are monogamous. Some are not. I don&#039;t think a bad marriage necessarily drives people to cheat. Plenty of really unhappy people stay loyal (I was one of them). But it is interesting. There are plenty of examples. Then again, the wives of these actors might be cheating, too. They might just be better at covering their tracks....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hummm&#8230;. but have they done a study of the marriages of the actresses who lost? Are they just as likely to break up? It seems like Hollywood in general has a very high 1) divorce rate 2) cheating spouse rate. I tend more toward the conclusions that Elizabeth Gilbert made in Committed: some people are monogamous. Some are not. I don&#8217;t think a bad marriage necessarily drives people to cheat. Plenty of really unhappy people stay loyal (I was one of them). But it is interesting. There are plenty of examples. Then again, the wives of these actors might be cheating, too. They might just be better at covering their tracks&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop the Madness! by Rachel Weingarten</title>
		<link>http://rachelcw.com/2010/03/10/stop-the-madness/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Weingarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelcw.com/?p=701#comment-542</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m kind of veering towards buying them too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m kind of veering towards buying them too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop the Madness! by Rachel Weingarten</title>
		<link>http://rachelcw.com/2010/03/10/stop-the-madness/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Weingarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelcw.com/?p=701#comment-541</guid>
		<description>thanks Irene!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks Irene!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Curse of The Golden Girls? by Rachel Weingarten</title>
		<link>http://rachelcw.com/2010/03/19/curse-of-the-golden-girls/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Weingarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelcw.com/?p=715#comment-539</guid>
		<description>That last sentence is just so beautifully put.  It&#039;s like that movie of some year&#039;s back &#039;Too Beautiful For You,&#039; when he had perfection he went in search of the ordinary.  Color me corny, but I was really rooting for her to have found &#039;the one&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last sentence is just so beautifully put.  It&#8217;s like that movie of some year&#8217;s back &#8216;Too Beautiful For You,&#8217; when he had perfection he went in search of the ordinary.  Color me corny, but I was really rooting for her to have found &#8216;the one&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Curse of The Golden Girls? by Rachel Weingarten</title>
		<link>http://rachelcw.com/2010/03/19/curse-of-the-golden-girls/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Weingarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelcw.com/?p=715#comment-538</guid>
		<description>I hate to get sappy, but I really do like her and think she&#039;s done a great job presenting herself professionally while still appearing open.  She didn&#039;t deserve this public blow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to get sappy, but I really do like her and think she&#8217;s done a great job presenting herself professionally while still appearing open.  She didn&#8217;t deserve this public blow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Curse of The Golden Girls? by Nicole</title>
		<link>http://rachelcw.com/2010/03/19/curse-of-the-golden-girls/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelcw.com/?p=715#comment-537</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if there&#039;s a &quot;curse&quot; though the statistics might lend a little credence to that theory.

It does, however, make one wonder just what it is that people -- men in particular -- want. Obviously, each of the individual cases are different and we don&#039;t know all of what goes on between these couples but ... 

Why isn&#039;t a talented, beautiful, smart woman who at least seems to also be a really good person AND who happens to have more wealth than any 20 people put together NOT ENOUGH?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if there&#8217;s a &#8220;curse&#8221; though the statistics might lend a little credence to that theory.</p>
<p>It does, however, make one wonder just what it is that people &#8212; men in particular &#8212; want. Obviously, each of the individual cases are different and we don&#8217;t know all of what goes on between these couples but &#8230; </p>
<p>Why isn&#8217;t a talented, beautiful, smart woman who at least seems to also be a really good person AND who happens to have more wealth than any 20 people put together NOT ENOUGH?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
